The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge to Google Inc.’s online book library from authors who said the project makes it harder for them to market their work.
The justices let stand lower court rulings in favor of Mountain View, Calif.-based Google and rejected the authors’ claim that the company’s digitizing of millions of books amounts to “copyright infringement on an epic scale.”
Lower courts have said that Google can provide small portions of the books to the public without violating copyright laws.
The Authors Guild and individual authors first filed their challenge to Google’s digital book project in 2005. Google has made digital copies of more than 20 million books from major research libraries and established a publicly available search function.
In October, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York agreed with a judge who concluded that Google was not violating copyright laws when it showed customers small portions of the books. The authors said the project would spoil the market for their work.
The appeals court said Google’s “snippet view, at best and after a large commitment of manpower, produces discontinuous, tiny fragments, amounting in the aggregate to no more than 16% of a book. This does not threaten the rights holders with any significant harm to the value of their copyrights or diminish their harvest of copyright revenue.”
The three-judge appeals panel did acknowledge, though, that some book sales probably would be lost if someone were merely searching for a portion of text to ascertain a fact.
Writers involved in the lawsuit include Jim Bouton, author of the bestseller “Ball Four”; Betty Miles, author of “The Trouble with Thirteen”; and Joseph Goulden, author of “The Superlawyers: The Small and Powerful World of Great Washington Law Firms.”
The case is The Authors Guild vs. Google, 15-849.