Prosecutors Group Slams Jussie Smollett Case Handling, FBI May Run Review

jussie smollett
Matt Marton/AP/REX/Shutterstock 

Jussie Smollett arrives at the Leighton Criminal Court Building for his hearin in Chicago on March 14, 2019. 

The Illinois Prosecutors Bar Association has issued a blistering critique of how Cook County prosecutors went about dropping all charges against Empire actor Jussie Smollett over his report of a racist, anti-gay attack. A Thursday (March 28)  statement says Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx and her representatives “have fundamentally misled the public on the law and circumstances surrounding the dismissal.” It said the approach “was abnormal and unfamiliar” to those in criminal law in Illinois.

Foxx this week has defended her staff’s work, saying the Smollett case was handled how it would have been for anyone with no criminal record. Her office didn’t have an immediate comment about the group’s comments. The association also pointed to apparent secrecy around a Tuesday hearing where charges were dropped, saying it added to an “appearance of impropriety.” 

Smollett’s attorney says his defense team won’t ask for any records to be destroyed in the Empire actor’s case. Patricia Brown Holmes said Thursday that Smollett’s defense team supports “the court files being preserved” in the now-sealed criminal case that accused the actor of filing a false police report.

Cook County prosecutors offered little explanation when they dropped felony charges against the actor on Tuesday. But they still insist the actor faked a racist, anti-gay attack on himself in January. During a court hearing earlier Thursday, Cook County Judge LeRoy K. Martin Jr. said there was “no possibility” the records related to Smollett’s case would be destroyed. He said: “In Cook County, we don’t destroy records.”

Prosecutors said during the hearing that they’d notify media outlets if Smollett’s lawyers try to expunge his record. Holmes said Smollett “has not and will not file a motion for destruction of any records.” The FBI was already investigating Smollett before Pres. Trump tweeted that the agency and the Department of Justice would review the case, which the president called “an embarrassment” to the nation.

Trump’s tweet on Thursday came two days after the surprise decision to drop the charges and Trump did not specify what aspect of the case would be probed, and Department of Justice officials declined to comment.

Some former federal prosecutors say there are enough anomalies to justify a Justice Department review of why prosecutors dismissed all 16 felonies. Among the red flags they cited: the unusual level of secrecy around the proceedings, including sealed court documents; prosecutors’ often muddled and contradictory explanations; and the absence of any requirement that the accused accept responsibility in exchange for dropping charges.

Investigators believe Smollett hired two brothers to stage the Jan. 29 attack and that Smollett hoped the attention would help advance his career. Police also allege that before the attack, Smollett sent a letter threatening himself to the Chicago television studio where Empire is shot. The FBI has been investigating that letter.

State prosecutors insisted that they could still prove Smollett concocted the entire assault. And even after charges were thrown out, the actor maintained that the attack was real. Phil Turner, an assistant U.S. attorney in Chicago before entering private practice, said federal prosecutors could, at minimum, seek an order for state prosecutors to preserve emails, texts and other documents that might shed light on why they acted as they did with Smollett.

Prosecutors’ hasty calling of the Tuesday hearing with no prior public notice and their swift sealing of court records showed a highly unusual and suspicious level of secrecy, Turner said. “It makes it look like they were clearly trying to pull a fast one,” he said. “It all smells funny.”

Federal prosecutors could, in theory, bring charges under a law that requires public officials to provide honest services to citizens if evidence emerges that any decision was made at the behest of influential people outside the state’s attorney’s office, Turner said. Justice Department investigators “could try to show that, if Cook County prosecutors did a favor for someone by dropping charges, that deprived people in Cook County of the honest services they deserve,” he said.

The case, he theorized, could qualify as a federal matter if communications about the decision took place on the phone or internet, placing it within federal jurisdiction. Another former federal prosecutor, Joel Bertocchi, sounded much more skeptical about the chances of a full-fledged investigation.

“You’d have to show the decision (to drop charges) was corrupt — not just bad or unexplainable,” he said. “Traded favors is not enough for corruption. It has to be money. And there’s no indication of that here.” While U.S. attorneys can in principle look into whatever they want, Bertocchi said, accepted practice is that they need some indication an actual crime was committed. “You can’t just investigate someone willy-nilly.”

The suspicions about the Smollett charges were shared by many in Chicago, including Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who has led official voices of outrage, telling reporters that “something is rotten in Denmark.” The city said Thursday it is seeking $130,000 from Smollett to cover the costs of the investigation into his reported beating.

The fact that Tuesday’s hearing was not put on the public court schedule and other factors added to an “appearance of impropriety,” according to the bar association, which said Cook County prosecutors had “fallen woefully short” of legal ethics.

The Arlington, Virginia-based National District Attorneys Association also weighed in, saying in a statement that aspects of the case may have run afoul of best practices, including the decision to abandon the charges without forcing Smollett to accept some degree of guilt.

The group alluded to Foxx’s decision to recuse herself before Smollett was charged because she had discussed the case with a Smollett family member. If the chief prosecutor withdraws, it said, the best practice is for the whole office to step away from a case and to appoint a special prosecutor.

Foxx defended her office’s decisions. Even if a trial had been held, Smollett would never have received a prison term because the 16 charges were the lowest form of felony. And if he pleaded guilty, it would have been to one count, not 16, she said.

“For all of the noise and all of the media attention, it’s a step up from a misdemeanor,” she told Chicago television station WGN. Most comparable cases are resolved with probation or an agreement such as Smollett’s if the defendants “don’t have a long rap sheet or a violence in their background.”


The Biz premium subscriber content has moved to

To simplify subscriber access, we have temporarily disabled the password requirement.