In January 2018, Stotland and his royalty investment company Otimo Music sued Royalty Exchange, MIH and the latter’s svp of A&R and artist relations Michael Conner for breach of contract, seeking undisclosed damages. Royalty Exchange then filed a motion to dismiss in Mar. 2018, but judge R. Brooke Jackson denied the motion last Thursday (Oct. 11). Veteran music lawyer and Berklee College of Music professor Allen Bargfrede has also been brought on as the plaintiff’s expert witness, according to documents obtained by Billboard.
“Nothing is more important to Royalty Exchange than meeting the needs of both buyers and sellers on our platform,” Royalty Exchange tells Billboard in a statement. “Of the more than 369 transactions we’ve facilitated to date, 40 percent involved repeat buyers, and 60 percent involved repeat sellers or those they referred. These results speak to our commitment to maintaining the integrity of the marketplace. While we cannot comment on pending litigation, we believe there is no legitimate claim against Royalty Exchange, and are confident the issue will be resolved in our favor.”
Stotland’s complaint, and Judge Jackson’s denial of Royalty Exchange’s motion, paint a different picture. Stotland and Otimo are arguing not necessarily that Royalty Exchange acted “knowingly or with an intent to defraud,” but rather that the company “did not perform the due diligence it was obligated to undertake and that it misrepresented its level of due diligence,” and hence that the jury “cannot say that [Royalty Exchange] did not act recklessly as a matter of law,” stated Jackson.
Around the time MIH first contacted Royalty Exchange (and shortly thereafter faced a lawsuit from King Lil G), MIH as a whole was not in good legal standing as an LLC in California due to tax evasion, documents show.
Nonetheless, Royalty Exchange still decided to put up the auction for King Lil G’s catalog “to gauge interest,” one source with knowledge of the situation tells Billboard.
According to the complaint, Stotland first found out about King Lil G’s lawsuit neither from MIH nor from Royalty Exchange in the auction process, but rather from a fourth party -- namely Nicholas Jampol, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP who was serving as counsel for Live Nation at the time -- nearly one entire month after wiring $420,000 to Royalty Exchange. (Jampol did not respond to a request for comment by press time.)
Stotland then emailed King Lil G’s counsel about the situation -- only to find out that they themselves were also unaware that King Lil G’s own label and publishing company was auctioning off his rights to Royalty Exchange in the middle of a legal dispute.
“Imagine this Mexican kid pouring his heart into his own music in Los Angeles, only to get an unexpected email from an investor in Montreal who thinks they’ve just acquired all of these royalties from him,” one source tells Billboard. “The whole situation is absurd.”
Public documents confirm that two of King Lil G’s albums listed on Royalty Exchange -- Blue Devil Part 2 and King Enemy -- were released before the rapper signed his label and publishing deal with MIH. Only 38 out of the 68 tracks in the auctioned catalog were registered with SoundExchange under MIH. The remaining 30 tracks were under other record companies, including PR Records and Double 9 Records. Bargfrede’s report suggested that Royalty Exchange only reviewed the first page of such royalty statements from SoundExchange in its due diligence process.
Finally, MIH contracts reveal conflicting agreements with Live Nation and Select-O-Hits (a subsidiary of The Orchard), both of which had agreed to license the same King Lil G material from MIH for exclusive YouTube distribution. "RX does not seem to have taken steps to reconcile or understand this contradiction anywhere in their due diligence," writes Bargfrede.
Part of what may have complicated the due-diligence process for Royalty Exchange is that MIH serves as King Lil G’s record label, publisher and artist management company simultaneously. This "presents an inherent conflict of interest for due diligence because MIH and [Michael] Conner were not able to provide an independent assessment [of royalty payments] on behalf of the artist," Bargfrede writes. (Bargfrede declined to comment for this story.)
Royalty Exchange is a marketplace, but not a broker, and doesn't represent sellers.
Royalty Exchange’s terms of service state that the company “cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of any information presented on any of its pages," and that investors "have the sole responsibility to examine all information concerning the investment opportunities on the Site" and "will make an independent evaluation of the investment opportunities."
King Lil G has still been performing frequently over the last year, and is about to launch his next tour on Nov. 1 with fellow rapper Rittz, according to the former’s Facebook page. Sources tell Billboard that King Lil G is handling the tour independent of MIH’s involvement and that MIH is now claiming to be defunct as an organization.
According to public documents, the earliest trial date for Stotland’s lawsuit against Royalty Exchange will be June 17, 2019. The lawsuit comes hot off the heels of a series of high-profile private syndicate offerings that Royalty Exchange launched this year with Cage the Elephant and Dire Straits.
Back in November 2017, Royalty Exchange had announced plans to launch an IPO, under subsidiary Royalty Flow, that would allow private investors to purchase shares in royalties from parts of Eminem’s catalog. The IPO was suspended in April 2018 due to wider controversies around public listing strategies.