Henley, who is quite protective of his intellectual property, has sued the clothing manufacturer in a California district court. He's alleging that the company's advertisement takes advantage of his celebrity and is likely to cause confusion among consumers about the source of sponsorship. He's represented by Melanie Howard and Thomas Jirgal at Loeb & Loeb.
A spokesperson for Henley told THR, "This kind of thing happens with some degree of frequency and the members of the Eagles always defend their rights, often at great expense. One would think that the people in charge of marketing for these corporations would have learned by now that U.S. law forbids trading on the name of a celebrity without permission from that celebrity.
"Both Mr. Henley and the Eagles have worked hard, for over 40 years, to build their names and goodwill in the world community. They pride themselves on the fact that they have never allowed their names, likenesses or music – individually or as a group – to be used to sell products. Their names are their trademarks and, therefore, they take offense when an individual or a business tries to piggyback and capitalize on their art, their hard work and their goodwill in the public arena," the spokesperson continued.
Here's Henley's complaint. The objectionable advertisement can be found on the fifth page.
This article was first published by The Hollywood Reporter