But according to Mann's lawsuit, not all of the music being provided by MediaNet is properly licensed. Mann is demanding statutory damages for willful copyright infringement of some 120 songs, which could amount to damages as high as $18 million.
The laws that govern the distribution of music are no doubt complicated and have grown more complex over time. Every song starts out as a composition, which is protected by its own copyright. When that composition becomes a sound recording, there is a separate copyright that protects that as well. The owner of the sound recording pays a mechanical licensing fee to the owner of the composition.
Starting in the 1990s, music began being distributed digitally, and Congress amended copyright laws to extend compulsory licensing to the delivery of phonorecords in digital form. However, the statute didn't apply to certain services that offered on-demand streams and limited downloads. That was confirmed by a New York judge in 2001.
To address this absence, representatives from the Recording Industry of America and the National Music Publishers Association began negotiating with each other and reached an agreement whereby RIAA members were able to make payments through the Harry Fox Agency. Later, an entity called the Copyright Royalty Board emerged that set rates and allowed some digital services like Pandora to pay compulsory licensing fees. Other services like Spotify have made direct deals with record labels.
MediaNet falls somewhere in the middle of all of this. The company appears to have had an interesting, legally contentious road toward becoming some form of back office aggregator of music for dozens of online music services.
After being sold to private equity firm Baker Capital, MediaNet continued to distribute works, which led to a class action lawsuit filed in 2008 by the Harry Fox Agency. That matter was settled in 2008, but another lawsuit came from various song publishers in 2011.
According to a declaration that was filed in the case by Stephen Grauberger, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, MediaNet attempted about a decade ago to seek compulsory licenses, but the lawyer said that notices sent by the company "were facially defective" for various reasons including the failure to reference other entities who would utilize the music.
Also in Grauberger's declaration (read here) was the astounding claim that sworn testimony had revealed that by 2012, "23 percent of MediaNet's catalog remains unlicensed."
The lawsuit was then confidentially settled.
Enter Aimee Mann, who hit it big in the mid-1980s with "Voices Carry," earned Academy Award and Grammy Award nominations for her "Save Me" song from Paul Thomas Anderson's "Magnolia," and has been producing critically-celebrated music ever since.
According to her complaint (which can be read here), filed on Monday in California federal court, she entered into a license agreement in 2003 with MediaNet (then known as MusicNet). The term of the license agreement was scheduled to end in 2006 but had automatic two-year extensions unless terminated by either party.
Mann's representative is said to have sent a termination notice in 2005, but nevertheless, "MediaNet continued after the Termination Date to transmit, perform, reproduce and distribute the Compositions as part of MediaNet's service, despite having no right or license to do so."
Besides suing for direct infringement, Mann is also claiming that MediaNet induced its business partners to commit copyright infringement. Mann also says she has not been paid any royalties by the company since Sept. 30, 2005 with the exception of a $20 advance this past March that was returned.
"This claim on behalf of Aimee Mann is without merit," says Frank Johnson, CEO of MediaNet in response. "MediaNet has had a license for her music since December 2003. We have been paying royalties regularly to her agents on her behalf. MediaNet is a supporter of artist rights and copyright and has been since we launched in 2001. We expect this matter will be resolved.”