Katy Perry Left Shark Design Rejected By Trademark Examiner

Kevin Mazur/WireImage
Katy Perry performs onstage during the Pepsi Super Bowl XLIX Halftime Show at University of Phoenix Stadium on Feb. 1, 2015 in Glendale, Arizona. 

She has better luck on the phrase "Left Shark."

Katy Perry's performance during halftime at this year's Super Bowl is still reverberating at the U.S. Trademark Office. On Friday, the pop singer got bad news that her company's initial attempts to register a "Left Shark" design had been rejected.

Dancing with two background dancers dressed as sharks, Perry had social media buzzing during her performance. Many were talking about the one on the left — actually, Perry's right — who seemed to be non-conforming to the choreography.

You Can Now Buy Official Katy Perry Left Shark Costumes

"Left Shark" became an Internet meme after the Super Bowl, and Perry's attempt to capitalize included a registration on the design as well as the phrases, "Left Shark," "Right Shark," "Drunk Shark," and "Basking Shark."

David Collier, the examiner, isn't yet impressed by the attempt to register the design. Looking at the application, he writes the design "identifies only a particular character; it does not function as a service mark to identify and distinguish applicant’s services from those of others and to indicate the source of applicant’s services."

In other words, there's not enough evidence submitted yet that consumers look at "Left Shark" and think a Katy Perry music performance.

The examiner finds another fault by looking at a submitted picture of Perry dancing with "Left Shark" and the drawing of "Left Shark" submitted as the design.

"Specifically, the specimen displays the mark as a stylized depiction of a forward leaning shark in nearly a front profile with a portion of a dorsal fin, two pectoral fins and two legs and feet substituted for the caudal fin on the tail," he writes. "The shark has five gills, a full mouth with teeth and round eyes with eyelids; however, the drawing displays the mark as a stylized depiction of an upright shark in full front profile with no dorsal fin, two full pectoral fins and two legs and feet; the shark has three gills and the sharks mouth appears without teeth; the shark also has oval eyes without eyelids."

Perry can try again, but at least she's had more luck on the registration of the word mark, "Left Shark." The examiner asks for a bit more clarification on the identity of goods she's attempting to assert dominion. For example, Perry's company says "costumes," but does she mean Halloween costumes or dance costumes? She says "figurines," but can she be more specific like saying "modeled plastic toy figurines"? But overall, she's on the way to having the registration published for potential opposition by others.

Left Shark Seller Won't Back Down From Katy Perry

The mixed success comes after Perry took on one designer named Fernando Sosa, who after the Super Bowl, attempted to capitalize on the phenomenon by selling a 3D printed figurine of "Left Shark."

Perry's lawyers quickly sent a cease-and-desist letter that stated, "As you are undoubtedly aware, our client never consented to your use of its copyrighted work and IP, nor did our client consent to the sale of the infringed product. Your unauthorized display and sale of this product infringes our client’s exclusive rights in numerous ways."

Sosa then retained an attorney, Chris Sprigman, who retorted that costumes are "generally not copyrightable" and asked why "Left Shark" should be treated differently.

Steve Plinio, the Greenberg Traurig attorney representing Perry, responded that Perry's team created shark drawings in the process of designing the costumes, and that those costumes were copyrightable.

Sprigman then volleyed back that the drawings were irrelevant, that the sketches might be copyrightable, "but that doesn’t make the Left Shark costume copyrightable."

That discussion mostly centered on copyright, which protects works of authorship, rather than trademark, which protects the phrases and images that identify and distinguish the source of goods and services. Stated another way, holding a "Left Shark" design copyright would allow Perry some ability to prevent others from creating derivatives while holding a "Left Shark"  trademark would allow Perry to attack those who would mislead the public into thinking she's behind their "Left Shark" endeavors.

Meanwhile, Perry isn't done with "Left Shark" at all. Here's a picture she put up last week on Instagram.